nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 06, v.40 92-99
义务语境下探望制度的构建与完善
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16433/j.cnki.cn41-1379.2024.06.006
发布时间: 2024-12-10
出版时间: 2024-12-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

探望制度构建的理论宗旨是儿童利益最大化原则与“子女本位”的现代婚姻家庭理念。《中华人民共和国民法典》以“赋权”为核心构建的探望制度,存在原则性偏差。这种制度缺失直接原则性条款,极易导致子女被边缘化,且在权利语境的立法模式下无法妥善解决子女利益保护缺位的难题。不同于传统大陆法系的“小监护”制度,我国“大监护”模式下,传统亲权内容早已包含于监护之中,父母保障子女进行适当会面交往已然成为监护职责不可或缺的一部分。以“定职”为核心,从义务语境下构建探望制度,是遵从制度本源的选择,有利于从根源上缓解探望纠纷中的冲突,满足多元主体的探望需求,促进制度的衔接与补充,克服现存的“硬伤”。义务语境下探望制度的构建与完善可从3方面展开:将保障未成年子女适当会面交往明确为一项监护职责;以子女利益最大化为原则构建核心制度;建立充分的制度衔接保障体系。

Abstract:

The theoretical tenets of visitation system are the principle of maximizing children's interests and “children-oriented” modern marriage and family concept. The visitation system, constructed on the basis of the core of the Civil Code “empowerment”, has deviations in principle, not only having a strong chance of easily leading to the marginalization of children due to the deficiency of direct principle clauses, but also lacking effective solutions under the context of the rights in the legislative mode. Different from the “minor guardianship” system in the traditional civil law system, traditional parental rights have long been included in the custody in the “major guardianship” system in China, which means ensuring children to visit and interact properly has become an indispensable part of the custody duty. Constructing a visitation system in the context of obligation with the core of “fixing duty” is a choice of complying with the origin of the system, which is beneficial for relieving the conflict of visitation disputes, satisfying the visitation needs of multiple subjects, promoting the connection and supplement of the system, and overcoming the existing “obvious flaws”. The construction and perfection of the visitation system in obligation context can be carried out from three aspects: defining proper meeting and communication of minor children as guardianship responsibility; building the core system on the principle of maximizing children's interests; and providing sufficient guarantee during institutional transitions.

参考文献

[1] 曹思婕.我国探望权的理论反思及制度完善 [J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,45(9):42-53.

[2] 曹思婕.探望权立法的完善思考 [J].理论探索,2023(4):122-128.

[3] 丁美君.我国探望权制度浅析 [J].求实,2013(z1):80-82.

[4] 刘余香.我国探望权制度的缺陷与完善 [J].求索,2009(8):152-153,212.

[5] 陈明侠.完善父母子女关系法律制度(纲要) [J].法商研究,1999(4):24-27.

[6] 陈奇伟,邱子芮,来文彬.论“儿童利益最大化”在家事立法与司法中之贯彻与完善 [J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,51(5):83-92.

[7] 夏吟兰,龙翼飞.家事法研究:2017年卷 [M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.

[8] 罗结珍译.法国民法典 [M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.

[9] 张文显.从义务本位到权利本位是法的发展规律 [J].社会科学战线,1990(3):135-144,147.

[10] 景春兰,殷昭仙.探望权及其主体扩展的立法思考:以“儿童最大利益”原则为视角 [J].法学杂志,2011,32(8):115-117.

[11] 夏吟兰.离婚亲子关系立法趋势之研究 [J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2007,47(4):63-71.

[12] 夏吟兰.比较法视野下的“父母责任” [J].北方法学,2016,10(1):25-34.

[13] 王利明.人格权法新论 [M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1994.

[14] 朱广新.论监护人处分被监护人财产的法律效果 [J].当代法学,2020,34(1):15-27.

[15] 陈卫佐.德国民法典:第5版 [M].北京:中国法律图书有限公司,2020.

[16] 夏吟兰.民法典未成年人监护立法体例辩思 [J].法学家,2018(4):1-15.

[17] 曹思婕.《民法典》视野下探望权属性探析 [J].现代法学,2022,44(3):35-52.

[18] 李贝.《民法典》时代隔代探望纠纷的裁判思路:从权利进路向义务进路的转向 [J].法商研究,2022,39(4):131-145.

[19] 娄必县.论未成年子女探望权的执行:以儿童福利为中心 [J].青少年犯罪问题,2015(1):59-66.

[20] 秦秀敏.浅谈探望权及其强制执行问题 [J].人民司法,2001(9):41-44.

[21] 姚璐.探望权主体范围扩张研究 [J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,14(4):31-38.

[22] 庄绪龙.“隔代探望”的法理基础、权利属性与类型区分 [J].法律适用,2017(23):82-90.

[23] 杨立新.“常回家看看”条款的亲属法基础及具体适用 [J].法学论坛,2013(6):99-107.

[24] 王晓琳.民法典婚姻家庭编草案三审:哪些修改备受关注?[J].中国人大,2019(21):52-53.

[25] 李春斌.探望权独立身份权说:以《民法典》第1086条为中心 [J].法治研究,2022,144(6):101-109.

[26] 瞿灵敏.探望权的理论反思与规则重构:兼论民法典婚姻家庭编探望权的立法完善 [J].江汉论坛,2018(9):122-130.

[27] FELLOWS M L,GALLANIS T P.The uniform probate code’s new intestacy and class gift provisions [J].ACTEC law journal,2020,46(2):127-184.

[28] 陈思琴,李杨.美国离婚后的虚拟探望制度及其启示 [J].南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2011,13(2):63-69.

[29] 张红艳.论探望权制度的构建 [J].理论月刊,2008(3):115-117.

[30] 王乔,顾承红.我国探望权制度中存在的若干问题及其完善 [J].社会科学辑刊,2005(2):60-64.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16433/j.cnki.cn41-1379.2024.06.006

中图分类号:D923.9

引用信息:

[1]王恩海,丑泽文.义务语境下探望制度的构建与完善[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(06):92-99.DOI:10.16433/j.cnki.cn41-1379.2024.06.006.

发布时间:

2024-12-10

出版时间:

2024-12-10

检 索 高级检索